Think about how people could interpret your resume, Part 1
by Travis Johnston on May.05, 2009, under Artificial Intelligence, Industry, Interviews, Lessons
I have gone to 100′s of pre-interview resume reviews with other programmers to discuss our thoughts on a candidate and determine what everyone will quiz them about. I am always still amazed how everyone can read the same resume and have completely different take on what could possibly be good or bad about this candidate . It is a different trigger for everyone, sometimes if anything is a little vague or over sounds overstated people get turned off and suddenly the interviewee is fighting an up hill battle.
Be very careful with the resume wording because given the chance people will often interpret it completely wrong…
Even if you write the clearest resume possible it is not even close to 100% so you still have to then anticipate all the ways they could take everything on your resume wrong and and figure out how you are are going to convince them of the right story on the phone or during the live interview. Is it a pain, yes. Is it right, probably not. But you literally have to be prepared to defend everything on your resume to make the interview go well. Some people will always come to the interview assuming the worst about the candidate and you will have to change their mind about every point.
Lets hit the examples:
Worked for company X for a long time.
You might be thinking that it shows loyalty to the company, dedication to your job and that your not a quitter during tough times. You might also be rightly thinking that is shows how valued of a employ you were, you survived 8 round of layoffs and your position was never in danger.
Others might see X years and think that means you have no ambition at all. They instantly think you are one of those people that found a place to hide and have just been collecting a paycheck for X years.
Defending working at a company for a long time, sounds silly right? When they comment that you about working for a company for a long time. Don’t just answer yes. If you started during the beginning, talk about how you helped grow the company and it was pride thing. If you got shares then talk about the ownership responsibility. If you did not have the above then talk about the great projects you got to work on or great friends you made or how much you learned there. Make sure they believe you had reasons to stay and now have a even bigger reason to leave.
Have a bunch of grind tasks on your resume.
Say you have done UI, TCR’s and some of the other grind tasks that people do not generally like to do. You might think this shows you are willing to take one for the team and do what is needed to get the game out. You might even think is shows you are not a prima donna and will not be bitching all the time.
Others will see it and think that you must not have any real skills if you have been given grind tasks. They will automatically rank you intern status because that is usually who they give those tasks too (yet they wonder why they often fail first submission).
Defending grind tasks. If you were on a time line explain that the project could not afford to be kicked and had to get through first time, it was an insurance policy thing. If you were doing other tasks as well explain that the grind tasks were in addition and you are really a super man in human cloths. If you were really only doing UI / TCR’s then explain how you were building tools and infrastructure so it would be less work for those that followed you. Point is to make sure they do not believe that you were tasked with grind work against you will or that you were not happy with it. Make it seem like it was a challenge or accomplishment.
There will be a second part to this topic as there are many more potential issues. Big take away should be to read your resume over and try to predict how people could take it wrong and be prepared to talk them down from that position. The thing is they will not ask you to defend your work experience, they will just drop an off hand comment on something and you need to detect it and then take over the conversation till you get your point across. Missing these small hints in the conversation means people will be leaving the interview with bad thoughts still and you have lost.
May 7th, 2009 on 1:39 pm
very interesting..
sounds like you’re saying that interviews are more about people reading/management skills than anything else?
May 7th, 2009 on 2:03 pm
I do not know if it is more about that anything, but I would say that without those skills you will do a lot more interviewing than you need to.